Mandy's Song
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Hmm...reflections
What did you find most useful or interesting in this course? how so? how might you apply that knowledge beyond this course?
Sorry the ape was cute ;) There were a couple things I found interesting and useful in this course.
- Discussion on current events
- News Sphere
- Movements of writing (I guess that's what you'd call it..)
Discussion of current events
Even though it was just a minor thing that we did to begin the class every day I thought that it was very useful to allocate time just to talk about whats going on. We get busy and have tons of stuff on our mind so its hard to keep up on stuff. Also different people are interested in different things so stuff I normally wouldn't really have looked into gets brought up and discussing the stuff in the news is also really interesting. it forces us to go beyond "hey this happened" "oh ok." to discussing why and what this means and onward.
News Sphere
It was interesting to go into how the news sort of revolves around itself and grows and expands and depends on itself taking the argument out of the good news v. bad news into the function of the news.
Movement of Writing
I go into this more with my post "Taking an Approach is Like Learning Music Theory" which I enjoyed a lot.
I felt more engaged in my writing. It wasn't like I just wrote the paper and turned it in and forgot about it. We talked about our writing and the writing groups are really helpful. I cared more about writing a good paper and to the best of my abilities not just an "A" paper...and there is a difference between the two....
Monday, March 5, 2012
Knock Out! (I hope anyway) Round 2 of Essay #2
Changing
the Dynamics: The Press Sphere
The
recent legislation against Internet piracy, brought to Congress in the forms of
SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect IP Act), and the subsequent
protests against the Acts exploded onto the news scene in traditional media as
well as not-so-traditional sources. By and by, it took about a millisecond for
the entire nation to know about the impeding legislation and about two
milliseconds for the rest of the world to find out. The impact of this story on
the legislation was as swift as it was devastating. The fact that this story
went “viral” so quickly and had such a huge impact says a lot about our current
media system today, how it is changing and what influences the stories we, the
people, get to hear about.
The story about SOPA and PIPA did
not actually become a story until a large-scale protest was organized by some
of the biggest names in the digital media world, such as; Google, Wikipedia, Facebook,
and Twitter. The initial reporting of
the story in traditional media focused largely on the protests rather than the
Acts themselves with headlines like, “Internet community cheers power of protest; Hundreds of websites
showed their support”, an article written by Roger Yu and Jon Swartz in USA
TODAY (Internet Community), or “Tech companies boldly protest anti-piracy bills”, an article
written by Beth
Krietsch in PR Week Magazine (Tech).
The first stories to surface about the protests were posted the Tuesday before
“Black Wednesday” (the name given to the protest) went into effect, but even
then only a small number of stories were published before the actual protests
began. According to Ben Dimiero’s report, “News Networks Ignore Controversial SOPA Legislation”, (which was
posted on January 5th, 2012. Black Wednesday occurred on January 19th,
2012) next-to-nothing was reported by traditional media
about SOPA and PIPA themselves. Dimiero writes,
As
the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) makes its way through Congress, most major
television news outlets -- MSNBC, Fox News, ABC, CBS, and NBC -- have ignored
the bill during their evening broadcasts. One network, CNN, devoted a single
evening segment to it” (Dimiero).
Apparently, SOPA and PIPA
had been extensively debated through sources on the Internet, from blogs to
forums to memes, for several months
leading up to the Black Wednesday Protests and had yet to be even remotely discussed
in the traditional media. Dimiero does give some credit where credit is due and
writes in his report that, “the online arms of most of these news outlets have posted regular
articles about the fight over the legislation, but their primetime TV broadcasts
remain mostly silent” (Dimiero).
Dimiero’s report unveils an interesting
perspective of today’s media system and press sphere as a whole. The reporting
of SOPA and PIPA shows us is that today’s media system is centered on events.
The bigger the event and the more important the event, the more reporting is
done. Now, there are huge discussions to be had about what is deemed “big and
important” by the press and why, but that is a debate for another day. For now,
lets leave it at this: SOPA and PIPA were not deemed important news until after
the Black Wednesday Protests. As Nick Tan, a blogger for the website Game Revolution, so eloquently writes,
So either mainstream media is extremely slow to pick up on things
(definitely possible), they're being paid not to cover it or to cover it once
and then slip it under the radar (also possible), or they've been waiting for
something big to happen like today's SOPA Blackout on the internet to give a
hoot about it (probably). Parentheses are original.
Both Tan and Dimiero discuss what is, and perhaps more
importantly, what is not reported in
Traditional media. But why wouldn’t traditional media report on
an issue that people obviously care about? Well, Tan lists some very compelling
reasons that other people have mentioned as well. In Josh Feldman’s article, “As
Major Companies Plan Blackout Protest, Where Has The Mainstream Media Been On
Coverage Of SOPA?” Feldman, who points to the fact that the parent companies of
most major media sources were, in fact, in support of SOPA and PIPA and yet did
not spend anytime covering the bills in the least. Feldman writes,
Either the network brass is pressuring the news
division to not cover the legislation at all (the more conspiratorial point of
view), or news anchors are simply avoiding their stories so as not to put their
jobs on the line. Some will argue that, perhaps, news anchors are avoiding the
story because there is so much more on their platter– why spend an entire
segment explaining the serious consequences of a convoluted bill when you have
a ten-second soundbite of Rick Santorum maybe saying the work “black“?
Whether the possibility exists or not, it does not exonerate reporters from
their responsibility to report”(Feldman).
In the end, Feldman writes that while Eric Boehlert believes that
“People are smart when it comes to their careers, and may feel that raising the
story isn’t a good way to get along with their parent companies,” he believes
that reporters knew the story wouldn’t go over well. Feldman writes, “I
suspect the networks are smart enough to understand that no matter how much you
try to put a smiley face on it, alarm bells go off in people’s heads when they
hear the phrase ‘regulate the internet’”(Feldman).
Despite Traditional Media’s somewhat
questionable efforts to avoid the story, it got out to the public anyway. The
efforts of the Digital Media Giants basically forced Traditional Media’s hand
and required them to run the story: highlighting the powerful influence the Internet
now holds over the press.
After the initial Black Wednesday Protests
the story quickly shifted focus from the main event to the response to the
event. This sort of shift is a natural progression for a typical news story,
especially a story as big as the protests against SOPA and PIPA. People want to
know what happens next, they want to know more. Thus, we began to see stories
that expanded their focus and delved into greater detail. We saw stories that
explained the SOPA and PIPA legislation in more detail, stories that focused on
the pros and cons to the legislation and stories that discussed the viewpoints
of the legislation’s opponents and defenders. However, what is unnatural about
this particular story’s development is how self-reflective it has forced media
to become. News writers and bloggers across the board all noticed that the SOPA
and PIPA protests were a shining example of Internet’s vast potential to
influence the press sphere and, in turn, the political landscape as a whole. The
Huffington Post’s article, “SOPA And PIPA Bills: Online
Companies Win Piracy Fight” points out that,
Just weeks ago, the bills seemed headed
toward quiet approval with bipartisan backing…The turnabout was so unexpected
that some think the online world's triumph signals a pivotal moment marking its
arrival as Washington's newest power broker. ‘This does serve as a watershed
moment,’ said Jennifer Stromer-Galley, a communications professor at the State
University of New York at Albany who studies how political groups use high
technology. "Certain channels for communication that people routinely use
have the power to get their users to become political activists on their behalf
(AP).
The
huge response garnered by the Black Wednesday Protests has shown the world just
how far-reaching and widely used digital media has become. With that reach
comes an immense amount of political power for the Digital Media Giants, a
power that most (even the giants themselves, I think) did not know they had.
The Huffington Post is but one of the many news providers, worldwide, that has
realized the power the Internet now holds. In an editorial published in The Observer, a newspaper in the United
Kingdom, the author writes, “Little people? Facebook,
Apple and Google are embryo media masters of the planet. Perhaps we still
tremble about BSkyB's cash clout or Fox News’s baleful influence, but that's
not the way News International sees the future. It feels weak, vulnerable and
scared” (The Internet). The Observer
notes the power shift from traditional media to the less traditional media of
the Internet. The Internet took a story that the traditional media had
previously ignored and turned it into an international media sensation.
According to The Observer, the idea
that digital media now has a greater influence over international news has News
International more than a little nervous.
Of course all this talk of power
poses a larger question, where did this power come from? The International Herald
Tribune answers that question in its article, “Internet generation flexes
its lobbying muscle; An impromptu coalition halted copyright bills, but can it
hold together?” The author writes,
Can
the Internet industry, along with legions of newly politicized Web users, be a
new force in Washington? And if so, what else can they all agree upon? If labor
unions once amplified the legislative agenda of certain American industries,
the anti-piracy fight showed the power of a different force: young Americans who
live and breathe the Internet (Internet Generation).
The
Huffington Post and The International Herald Tribune both note the underlying reason
the Internet has gained so much power; young Americans use the Internet as
their source for news more than almost every other media tool that exists
today. There lies the strange self-reflective quality of this news story.
Through the press sphere this story has morphed into a story about the future
of the press sphere.
Through the press sphere the Black
Wednesday Protests became more than just a story about protests against
anti-piracy bills, the protests became a symbol of a new age. The interaction
of the press, the simple reporting, the claims and counter-claims, the
expanding and forwarding of ideas, serves to dig out from a story its essential
meaning and purpose. For the SOPA/PIPA story its implications became very
clear: a new era of News Media has arrived and with it comes a shift in the
power balance between traditional media, digital media and, subsequently, the
entire political landscape of how we, the people, receive and influence our
news.
Works
Cited
AP.
"SOPA And PIPA Bills: Online Companies Win Piracy Fight." The
Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 21 Jan. 2012. Web. 28 Feb. 2012.
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/21/sopa-and-pipa-bills-anti-piracy-legislation_n_1220817.html>.
Dimiero,
Ben. "REPORT: News Networks Ignore Controversial SOPA Legislation." Media
Matters for America. 5 Jan. 2012. Web. 27 Feb. 2012.
<http://mediamatters.org/blog/201201050008>.
Feldman,
Josh. "As Major Companies Plan Blackout Protest, Where Has The Mainstream
Media Been On Coverage Of SOPA?" Mediaite.com. 8 Jan. 2012. Web. 05
Mar. 2012.
<http://www.mediaite.com/tv/as-major-companies-plan-blackout-protest-where-has-the-mainstream-media-been-on-coverage-of-sopa/>.
"Internet
community cheers power of protest; Hundreds of websites showed their
support." USA TODAY. (January 19, 2012 Thursday): 958 words. LexisNexis
Academic. Web. Date Accessed: 2012/02/28.
"Internet
generation flexes its lobbying muscle; An impromptu coalition halted copyright
bills, but can it hold together?." The International Herald Tribune.
(January 28, 2012 Saturday): 1109 words. LexisNexis Academic. Web. Date
Accessed: 2012/02/28.
Tan,
Nick. "Mainstream Media Ignoring SOPA." Game Revolution. 18
Jan. 2012. Web. 27 Feb. 2012.
<http://www.gamerevolution.com/manifesto/mainstream-media-ignoring-sopa-10587>.
"Tech
companies boldly protest anti-piracy bills." PR Week (US). (January 19, 2012):
450 words. LexisNexis Academic. Web. Date Accessed: 2012/02/28.
"THE
INTERNET: Beware new dynasties in fight for web freedom." The Observer
(England). (January 22, 2012): 1176 words. LexisNexis Academic. Web. Date
Accessed: 2012/02/28.
17 people from Russia looked at my blog...or maybe one Russian 17 times??
Perhaps one of these two?
So I was just wondering if any of you have looked at the page views for your blogs...apparently I'm popular in Russia...I mean I'm sure they didn't stay too long...a class blog can only be so interesting but still, pretty cool. Here are my "all-time" stats as of today.
United States 236
|
Russia 17
|
Germany 9
|
Brazil 2
|
Ecuador 1
|
Saudi Arabia 1
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)